Anders als im Europ\u00e4ischen Patentraum kann im US-Patentrecht bereits ein Verkauf unter Geheimhaltung patentsch\u00e4digend sein und der sogenannten „on sale bar“ unterliegen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
„The FCAC concluded that \u201cif the existence of the sale is public, the details of the invention need not be publicly disclosed in the terms of sale\u201d for the on sale bar to apply. This ruling may not make the on sale bar absolute \u2013 if the existence of a sale is itself secret, it appears to fall outside the reasoning of the FCAC \u2013 but it does make it clear that a number of situations of practical interest may be caught by the on sale bar.“<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Quelle: https:\/\/ipcopy.blog\/2019\/02\/05\/nobody-knows-just-we-two-patents-sales-and-confidentiality\/)<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Anders als im Europ\u00e4ischen Patentraum kann im US-Patentrecht bereits ein Verkauf unter Geheimhaltung patentsch\u00e4digend sein und der sogenannten „on sale bar“ unterliegen. „The FCAC concluded that \u201cif the existence of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[44,45],"class_list":["post-554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-patent","tag-on-sale-bar","tag-us-patent-law"],"yoast_head":"\n